|
|
The
high risk factor for Scotties is based on reviewing hundreds of
cases from multiple institutions in the Veterinary Medical Database,
over a period from 1975 to 1995; the 18 times risk factor was published
by Dr. Glickman at Purdue University, by Carole Fry Owen when she
was a Scottish Terrier Club of America Health Trust Fund trustee
and by Dr. Marcia Dawson, former Health Trust Fund chairperson and
Purdue staffer.
Other breeds at a higher than average risk included Shelties, Wire
Fox and Westies with an odds ratio of 4.5, 3.2 and 3.0 respectively.
McTavish breeders’ website below talks about the high rate
of cancer in Scotties and how breeders are working together to improve
the health of Scotties, saying “Scotties tend to be a healthy
breed. This happy situation is a result of their long genetic evolution
in the Scottish Highlands and the care of the breed taken by fanciers
over the years. This is not to say that there are not health problems
- there are, and some breeding lines will show more problems than
others, but the openness of breeders and the action taken by breed
clubs to address the problems are actually improving the breed”.
“Scotties are at high risk for some cancers, particularly
lymphosarcoma, bladder and urinary tract cancers, malignant melanoma
and gastric carcinoma. Research into cancers is ongoing and early
detection is critical in affecting a cure”.
http://www.mactavishscotties.ca/scotties/health.html
This next one provides information on holistic treatment:
http://www.shirleys-wellness-cafe.com/acancer.htm
This one is specific to Scottie Cancer:
http://www.tartanscottie.com
When cancer hit Piper, we could not believe our misfortune in having
it happen a second time, as we had known about pesticides and cigarette
smoke and vitamins and exercise. We more were rigorous about avoiding
the known hazards than the average Scottie owner, because we were
informed.
We made the microwave mistake above about four times in his lifetime,
not knowing about the risks to both animals and humans. We no longer
even have a microwave in our house, and if I have to use the microwave
at work I only use crockery containers. We did treat Piper with
Advantage for fleas, and we were renovating, so he might have had
one or two exposures to breathing varsol from a distance.
Piper was a different kind of Scottie in that he got four walks
per day, including one longer walk; he was not at all sedentary.
Piper got no canned food other than very premium canned food very
occasionally (once or twice a year). He ate only the food we ate
(scary thought), although we never fed him from the table as he
had gone through obedience training. He got lots of good vitamins
and greens. He never breathed smoke in his life. We would in future
give a Scottie nothing but organic food.
Piper developed a bit of a taste for ice cream, and got it from
us--even when we were totally silent taking it from the refrigerator
and he was in another room he would appear as soon as the lid silently
came off of a cardboard ice cream box-- maybe once a month.
Piper received the Wisconsin Protocol treatment at the Animal Critical
Care Unit in Burnaby, BC, that does all of the cancer treatment
for animals in the Greater Vancouver area. When he got cancer, we
originally had the impression on talking to the doctors, that we
had a one-in-four chance of remission; this is in the shorthand
notes I took during the visit. We didn’t know that remission
does not mean the possibility of a normal lifespan, as it does in
human cancer treatment. What it means is that we had a one-in-four
chance of getting up to two years. This was not at all clear to
us at the time. We were in a state of shock when we had to make
some critical decisions involving a lot of money, as well as our
emotional and physical health, and Piper’s emotional and physical
health.
The vets fully informed us, and re-informed us in writing, but obviously
they are not going to recommend against a treatment that funds their
research databases and is in fact their livelihood. This is part
of the reason I suggest that diverting some of these research funds
to a breeding program which would expand the gene pool, should be
considered; it could achieve more positive results in the short
term, while research continues to be done.
We would have done anything to save Piper at that stage. It would
have taken more guts than we had to let him die without trying to
help him. Our veterinarian recommended that we go for the “very
best” treatment for Piper. What was “the very best”
was in fact the most expensive treatment administered by the best
doctors, but that treatment benefited only the doctor’s research
database while extending Piper’s life nine months longer than
the two months they said we had without their treatment. Their stated
goal was quality of life.
Although Piper was a very happy dog all of his life, having to watch
him suffer was very hard on us. I do, however, think Piper would
have chosen to live those extra nine months, as he was a great lover
of life, and took an avid interest right to the end, in people and
events.
On his final day, he woke me early, and we did yoga together on
the carpet, me doing back exercises and him rolling on his back
and rubbing up against me. Then my husband let him walk free down
Eagle Harbour creek to the ocean. Then we went to the vet, and I
held his front paws as we all told him what a good dog he was. Although
he was very frightened until sedated while hoovering liver treats,
he went very peacefully in the end.
If I had it to do over again, I would have used Prednizone only—no
chemotherapy—and I would have had the vet come to the house,
as by the time of his death Piper had developed an absolute horror
or veterinarian’s offices.
At this stage in chemotherapy treatment for dogs, chemotherapy is
not the best for the dog or for the owner. Chemotherapy is a very
serious poison which the doctors say is necessary because “cancer
is an aggressive disease requiring an aggressive treatment”.
While chemotherapy has worked miracles for people, in canine therapy
it can actually speed up the death of the dog, which is traumatized
and re-traumatized with the treatment. This is particularly true
of Scottish Terriers who are very sensitive and intelligent dogs.
There was only an extremely remote chance of a normal lifespan,
or even living for another two years, but by the time we realized
this, on receiving clarification in writing from the vets, we had
started down the road of the Wisconsin Protocol. Although Piper
was treated with great caring and love, only a miracle would have
saved him.
Do not try to buy hope for yourself, and make your dog suffer through
chemotherapy. They will lose their hair, they will throw up a lot,
and they will lose their strength and vitality after every treatment.
You will end up losing a dog and losing a lot of money, rather than
just losing a dog, which is tragedy enough.
Some breeders, particularly of the backyard variety are a) unaware
of the statistically higher risk of cancers in Scotties identified
by the American Kennel Club and the Scottish Terrier Club of America
or b) previously unaware of the solution or c) taking no steps to
prevent the problem by more careful breeding specifically directed
at expanding the gene pool safely, d) they think if they ignore
it, it will go away, or e) they are puppy mills wanting only to
make money and caring little about this great breed of dogs.
|